Search This Blog

Sunday, June 9, 2013

Home Affordability Becoming More Unequal Across U.S.

Filed under: News, BuyingThe Trulia Price Monitor and Trulia Rent Monitor are the earliest leading indicators of how asking prices and rents are trending nationally and locally. They adjust for the changing mix of listed homes and therefore show whats really happening to asking prices and rents. Because asking prices lead sales prices by approximately two or more months, the monitors reveal trends before other price indexes do. With that, heres the scoop on where prices and rents are headed.Prices Up 9.5% Year-Over-Year, and Rising in 98 of 100 Largest Metros: In May, asking home prices rose 1.1 percent month-over-month, seasonally adjusted. Thats slower than in previous months -- asking prices rose 1.4 percent in each of February, March, and April (includes revisions) -- but still at a very fast clip. Quarter-over-quarter, prices are up 4.0%, seasonally adjusted. Year-over-year, prices are up 9.5% nationally and are higher than one year ago in 98 of the 100 largest metros.Prices Rising Sharply in the Least Affordable Markets: Recent price gains are squeezing would-be buyers in metros where the cost of owning is steep. We created a measure of local affordability based on current asking prices and the most recent wage data available (from the 2012 third-quarter Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages survey). We estimated how far a typical workers wages to go pay the mortgage on a standard-sized home (1800 square feet) at current mortgage rates (3.8 percent), using local wages and local asking prices. (Keep in mind that wages are not the only source of income, and some households have more than one wage-earner while others have none. That means the actual cost-of-housing burden for a particular household may be higher or lower, but our method is designed compare affordability across metros in an apples-to-apples way.) The monthly mortgage payment relative to the typical workers wages ranges hugely, from a high of 74 percent in Honolulu and 55 percent in San Francisco to just 8 percent in Detroit and 12 percent in Houston and Atlanta.Among the 10 least affordable metros, eight had double-digit price gains in the past year. Three (all in California) had price gains of more than 20 percent: Orange County, Oakland, and San Jose. Among the 10 least affordable metros, the average Y-o-Y asking price gain was 16.3 percent.In contrast, among the 10 most affordable metros, prices rose 9.5 percent on average -- same as the national price increase, but well behind the average price gain for the 10 least affordable metros. The affordable metros of Detroit, Atlanta, Memphis, Fort Worth and Dallas all had double-digit price gains, but the rest of the most affordable metros had price gains below the national rate.The Widening Affordability Gap -- and Why it Matters: Across all 100 metros, less affordable markets tend to have high price gains. The correlation between the Y-o-Y price gain and the mortgage-payment-versus-wage measure is 0.3 (statistically significant at the 5 percent level). That means that homeownership affordability is becoming more unequal across the U.S. -- the gap between more affordable and less affordable markets is growing. This growing gap means two things for the housing market:First, as local markets become more unequal, more people will consider moving from less affordable to more affordable areas. The example of California makes this clear: In the years when California home prices were even more out of line with the rest of the U.S., more people left California for other states. Therefore, widening affordability gaps could cause more people to make long-distance moves to a more affordable local housing market.Second, a widening affordability gap puts pressure on housing policy. Its harder to come up with one-size-fits-all national housing policies when local markets are becoming more different from each other. For instance, more expensive markets tend to benefit more from the mortgage interest deduction -- so as prices become more unequal, it means that the impact of any changes to the mortgage interest deduction would be even more concentrated in some geographic areas.Rents Rising More Slowly in More Affordable Markets: Rents are up 2.3 percent year-over-year nationally. Rents are rising faster than prices in just 2 of the 25 largest rental markets: Houston and Philadelphia. Among the five least affordable rental markets, rents are rising strongly in Miami and Boston, steadily in New York, but only modestly in San Francisco and Los Angeles. In contrast, in three of the most affordable big-city rental markets -- Seattle, Las Vegas, and Sacramento -- rents were flat or falling.Jed Kolko is the chief economist for online listings site Trulia. This article originally appeared on the Trulia Trends blog.%Gallery-190467%More on AOL Real Estate:Find out how to calculate mortgage payments.Find homes for sale in your area.Find foreclosures in your area.Find rental housing in your area.Follow us on Twitter at @AOLRealEstate or connect with AOL Real Estate on Facebook.  Permalink | Email this | Commentshttp://realestate.aol.com/blog/2013/06/06/homeownership-affordability-gap/ @ uwad.com

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.